DOJ Digs for Answers in Sam Bankman-Fried's Defense
However, in a series of legal back-and-forths, Bankman-Fried’s counsel has continually stated that he received legal guidance, making him believe he acted in full faith. Hence, the heart of the matter lies in whether Bankman-Fried genuinely sought legal advice and acted accordingly or if it was merely a defense ploy.
Challenges in Pre-Trial Preparations
Bankman-Fried’s current legal situation could be better with his lawyer, Mark Cohen, being vocal about the difficulties they’ve encountered. Specifically, the limited internet access provided to Bankman-Fried has become a significant concern. Cohen stated,
“Internet access, offered just two days a week, is woefully inadequate.”
Consequently, preparing a robust defense strategy under such constraints becomes challenging. Moreover, the proximity to the trial date and the government’s late reception of discovery materials add to their woes.
Recommended Articles
Crypto Presale Projects For 2023 To Invest; Updated List
Must Read
Best Crypto Trading Bots List 2023
Must Read
Top Crypto Marketing Firms / Agencies 2023; Here’s Best Picks [Updated]
Must Read
Crypto Telegram Channels List 2023 [Updated]
Must Read
Top 10 Web3 Games To Explore In 2023; Here List
Must ReadBankman-Fried’s Jail Conditions
Besides the legal quagmire, Bankman-Fried’s condition in jail has also been highlighted. Reports suggest he’s subsisting on a minimal bread, peanut butter, and water diet. However, in a small win for the defense, Judge Kaplan allowed daily in-person meetings between the defendant and his attorneys.
As the trial date draws nearer, all eyes will be on how this high-stakes legal drama unfolds. The DOJ’s recent move to bar all of Bankman-Fried’s proposed expert witnesses from the October trial only intensifies the situation. Significantly, the outcome could set a precedent in the crypto world, underscoring the fine line between innovative finance and regulatory boundaries.